RSS Feed

Category Archives: First Amendment

President Trump

I do support the fine job that President Trump is doing and I feel absolutely no need to defend him. As far as I am concerned, he has done nothing out of the ordinary and has only the best interests of the United States in his sights. No other president has ever been subjected to such close scrutiny by the media. Every private conversation is invaded and reported. Every good and noble deed is buried and ignored. No privacy, many betrayals and

It is an incredible sight to see how organizations like CNN subtly utilize the English language to manipulate feelings. Adjectives are used in places where news stories do not usually have adjectives. Panels of talking heads are not divided between Democrats and Republicans…they are all Democrats discussing with backgrounds in various branches of liberal extremism. I watched for almost an hour (it was as much as I could take) and I did not hear one single conservative idea or common sense point of view. If it wasn’t so real it would have reminded me of a bad Saturday Night Live episode from the seventies.

Former President Obama used his eight years in office to create a race problem in America. Since the sixties progress might not have been as rapid as some would want, but morality cannot be legislated, it just does not work! From slow and steady forward progress we began to regress. Now there is rampant racism against blacks and whites. Those of us who helped lead the way to honest social acceptance, who ostracized the people who told racial jokes, who raised our kids to accept everyone as a child of God are now faced with inexplicable hostility from blacks.

So….

I am not angry with my president, I am angry with Dick Durbin for having such a big mouth and reporting a private conversation to the media. I am disgusted with a senator who spoke into the microphone with absolutely no concern for how his words would affect our relationships with other nations. Dick Durbin is a prime example of a liberal who obviously places political party affiliation ahead of loyalty to his country.

Meanwhile, from the shady underhanded negotiations and shenanigans leading up to and the hidden side agreements included in the deal itself, not to mention the illegal way that the former president got it approved (or not) all the way to the four men callously left to die in Benghazi along with the entire embassy. Has anyone forgotten the famous phrase,”If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.”? Or we could remember monumentally embarrassing Obama actions, who else would return Churchill’s bust to the English?

So…

Why is the media trying to make Donald J. Trump into such a train wreck. By every measure of honesty, the train wreck is not President Trump regardless of how hard the media works to make it so. And it is so very obvious that they are working overtime to create that image as hard as they can. As President Trump keeps the economy on track and keeps Congress scrambling in the right direction, there is little doubt that the media will just become more hateful and childish. Be prepared.

Just one more random point: the Statue of Liberty was given to us by France. The poem about immigrants which was inscribed at the base was added later and was never meant to be a promise or a policy statement. The poetry is a tribute to America’s melting pot, it is not a mandate or requirement to open our borders!

Advertisements

Mo Brooks Words of Advice

http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/mo_brooks_sticking_by_moore_go.html#incart_river_home

Mo Brooks sticking by Moore: GOP agenda ‘vastly more important than contested sexual allegations’

Updated 8:24 PM; Posted 7:31 PM

By Howard Koplowitz 
hkoplowitz@al.com

“America faces huge challenges that are vastly more important than contested sexual allegations from four decades ago,” Brooks said in a text message to AL.com. “Who will vote in America’s best interests on Supreme Court justices, deficit and debt, economic growth, border security, national defense, and the like? Socialist Democrat Doug Jones will vote wrong. Roy Moore will vote right. Hence, I will vote for Roy Moore.”

Moore has been accused by two women of initiating sexual encounters with them when they were 14 and 16 years old and Moore was in his 30s as an assistant district attorney in Etowah County. Moore has denied the allegations, saying the claims are politically motivated.

While Brooks said he would vote for Moore, he declined to say whether he still endorses the embattled Republican candidate. He also would not say whether he believes Moore or the women making the allegations, although he pointed to the Duke University lacrosse case as an example of sex claims that have been proven wrong.
“As a Duke grad, I vividly remember the false accusations against and defamation of the Duke lacrosse team. The players were horribly treated by the news media until the truth finally came out and totally exonerated them,” he said. “As an attorney, I know accusations are easy. Proving them to the satisfaction of a judge, a jury, or here, voters, is another thing. I do not know enough of the evidence to know with confidence what the true facts are.”
Although Moore’s first public accuser, Leigh Corfman, is a Republican who voted for Donald Trump in 2016, Brooks suggested there is plenty of political motivation to make false claims.

“I do believe this, there are millions of people in America who would lie in a heartbeat if it meant adding another Democrat to the Senate,” he said.
The Huntsville congressman earlier told Roll Call that he would be voting for Moore because of policy issues.
“I have seen what a lot of people have said. A United States senator from Alabama is going to have a huge effect on national public policy issues and the votes that will be cast on the Senate floor will determine the future of our country. That is my primary concern,” he said.(emphasis mine-Cat)

Brooks, who was a candidate for the Senate seat in the Republican primary, was ambiguous about whether he would mount a write-in campaign for the Dec. 12 special election. Brooks went on to endorse Moore.
“As long as Roy Moore is our nominee, a Republican cannot wage a write-in campaign, under Alabama Republican Party rules, and be on the ballot as a Republican in the future,” he said.
Meanwhile, conservative pundit Ann Coulter, who endorsed Brooks in the primary, advocated on Twitter for Moore to be replaced on the ballot with Brooks:
Brooks declined to say whether he would be open to that idea.
The more I read the more I question, but I refuse to convict anyone absent more proof and a chance for Moore to defend himself. Furthermore, I agree with the candidate I voted for in the first place. Moore is better than a socialist democrat and it IS a very short term.

Regarding Tantrums..

A PROTEST WITHOUT A PURPOSE ISNT A PROTEST, IT’S A TANTRUM                                                                                                                            The Birmingham News – October 13, 2017
By State Rep. Rich Wingo (R – Tuscaloosa), who serves House District 62                                                                                                                      in the Alabama Legislature. Wingo was a member of the University of                                                                                                                                         Alabama football team from 1974 to 1978, and played for the                                                                                                                                                                                        Green Bay Packers from 1979 to 1986.
As a former linebacker for the NFL’s Green Bay Packers and the University of Alabama, I had the opportunity to play for two of the finest men to ever serve as head coaches – Paul “Bear” Bryant and Bart Starr.
One of the most important lessons Coach Bryant and Coach Starr taught me was plain and simple respect — respect for ourselves, respect for our coaches and teammates, and respect for our great nation. They also stressed showing your class in every situation and being humble.

The current “protests” being staged against our nation’s flag and anthem by players throughout the NFL violate every principle of respect those two great men drilled into players like me during their careers. The NFL is currently suffering from a complete lack of good leadership and it hurts me to watch it happen. The two coaches under whom I played simply would not have allowed the current situation to come to pass, and, instead, would demand that their players show proper respect for the patriotic symbols of our nation and its people. Like many Americans, I do not view the act of NFL players “taking a knee” during the National Anthem as an acceptable form of protest.
Most of the players who have chosen to sit or kneel have not outlined a specific reason, stated a goal, or defined what constitutes a victory in their eyes. If they have no goals to achieve by kneeling, how can they know when to start standing again?

A protest without a purpose is not a protest – it’s a tantrum.

The sadness of the situation was only compounded when players for the Baltimore Ravens and Jacksonville Jaguars took a knee when the “Star Spangled Banner” was played before their recent game on foreign soil in London, but they stood at attention during “God Save The Queen.”

I do believe that every American has the right to protest or to have their voice heard, but they must be prepared to accept the consequences. Americans are likely to abandon the NFL by the millions if players continue to betray and insult our nation and its enduring symbols of freedom.
There are other, more effective and less offensive methods players may utilize to express their dissatisfaction with whatever is angering them. They could easily stage a rally, hold a press conference to protest, or, more importantly, invest or volunteer in their communities and do something constructive to change lives for the better.

We do not have to look too far into our nation’s past to see where the disrespect for American values and symbols took root. Activist judges and weak leadership in past generations forced the Pledge of Allegiance and prayer to be taken out of our children’s classrooms, and Hollywood has joined forces with the mainstream media to promote a radical social agenda that has turbocharged moral decay. Millions of brave men and women have fought, bled, and died on foreign battlefields across the globe in order to defend our nation and the symbols that define it.

In my opinion, the NFL players’ actions are one step away from burning an American flag on the 50-yard line, and the commissioner, team owners, and coaches need to do what Coach Bryant and Coach Starr would have done by demanding an end to the on-going sideline shenanigans immediately.
note: I would like to add that I remember “Bear” Bryant having a very low tolerance for disrespect, bad behavior or breaking team rules. His players were mostly proud to be held to tough standards and high expectations. It may have been old school, but many have continued on to have successfull and fulfilling careers. -cat-

Sports Post

In the interests of full disclosure, I freely admit that I am not a professional sports fan. I sometimes enjoy college football, when my team is winning, but my interests lie elsewhere. Living in Alabama, however, I am completely and totally surrounded by football fanatics and so have had no choice whatsoever but to cultivate a healthy respect and a minimally respectable body of knowledge regarding the sport.

The First Amendment only protects the citizen’s right to free speech from government control. It does not apply in employment situations, in clubs or societies with rules and regulations that govern such things, in any situation not involving the government or a government funded entity. Keeping this in mind, it should be immediately obvious to anyone with even half a brain that the First Amendment does not apply to guaranteeing random hired football players the right to disrespect the American Flag and the National Anthem in the course of their employment.

The issue is not “social justice”. If that were the issue then peaceful protest, meeting with community leaders, working through churches associating with other churches, petitioning the President or requesting a meeting with the White House or the Governor’s office. The issue is not “freedom of speech”. If these players want to work towards social change or if they feel that they must speak out against social injustice then they should do what the entire remainder of the employed United States does…..PURSUE YOUR PERSONAL POLITICS ON YOUR OWN TIME!

President Trump is not dividing us by calling out the owners for allowing this. He is expressing the opinion of millions who either believe that a football game is no place to air your political views or who believe that disrespecting the flag and the Star Spangled Banner is the wrong way to express yourself and will not encourage dialogue at all. Real facts and statistics work much better, preferably the sort that cannot be debunked.

All of the rest of the commentary revolving around this “issue” is nonsense.

If You Can’t Beat ‘Em…


After a great deal of serious thought and Kafka-esque consideration I believe that perhaps Black Lives Matter and the “Antifa” movement might have a workable idea. Sanitizing our history is just a way to clean it up, a bit like we clean up our homes. We just need to all take part in the process to ensure fairness and equality, I am quite sure that if we research and work diligently together we can produce a non-offensive, easily read, beautifully crafted and well assembled history in just a few years. My esteemed grandparents would have said, “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander”.
I am very sure that our Native American citizens would support removing all statues and busts of President Jackson who ignored the Supreme Court in order to force the Cherokees down the long, painful “Trail of Tears”. He would also likely warrant having his name removed from state capitols and streets and etc. for such an egregious action. He did break numerous treaties but this was the worst sin of all in my humble opinion. He was not an honorable man.

In addition, although I am a very great admirer of those intrepid men the Kiowa named Buffalo Soldiers, there are undoubtedly a goodly number of native Americans who feel that the label carries less positivity and heroism. In consideration of those many native Americans who lost their lives to Buffalo Soldiers in defense of their homes and families, perhaps the monuments erected in honor of those first African American army units (the 9th and 10th I think) should be removed and placed inside a museum. Remember that the Indians were being Invaded.

Manzanar National Historic Site would likely also be on the list simply because it is so deeply offensive to most every American today. Manzanar was one of the ten camps set up for our Japanese American citizens during WWII. The camp housed over 100,000 people and over 100 of them died while they were imprisoned there! Those that lived built this monument, however, if it is an affront to the sensibilities of others it will naturally have to be taken down. 

On a more personal level, there are thousands of conservatives who feel that the evils of our ever expanding administrative arm of government became permanently entrenched and set forth as precedent under the guidance and leadership of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Many educated conservatives would agree with me that in spite of the good he contributed at the time, he set the stage for normalizing progressivism. He encouraged citizens to depend on the government for sustenance and he expanded the role of government in ways the Constitution does not support and never even envisioned. Why should we have statues that honor him?

These are just a few possibilities that might come up. I believe that there is a national registry of monuments and statues which could be reviewed by each and every race, religion, political group, historical society, club, citizen’s organization, etc. There might be a few monuments and/or statues left that we could all agree on! 

Everything else might be replaced with modern art…..after all, no one even knows what it is!

Politically Manipulative and Incorrect

Freedom. Of. Speech.

Everyone throws that phrase around like it means saying whatever you please, without thought or rationale, never checking for any connection or relationship to the truth however distant and disregarding any and all consequences resulting therefrom. There is the Constitutional protection that American citizens have from government censorship. In addition, our privacy laws guarantee us the freedom to say what is on our minds to friends and family when we are not in public. (We hope) Otherwise, we all have to watch what we say!

It is a controversial subject these days. The mainstream media (MSM) along with the liberals are trying to shut down conservative commentators, talk show hosts and other prominent conservative political pundits. (I will make an exception of Fox News as it is the only place you will see a clip of Donald Trump condemning David Duke in 1991). Republicans, Libertarians and conservatives have been successfully rolled up into one group for ease of branding. The branding from the left has been constant, vitriolic and specific. Most of the allegations have been of a racial nature or being accused of corruption like the establishment Republicans. Nothing shuts down civil discourse between two ideologically opposed groups of people faster than a racial accusation or slur! The MSM has been very helpful in this cause. There are many places now where conservative thought and speech is considered offensive and unacceptable (read Silicon Valley, Hollywood and most major universities). One’s job can easily be lost if it becomes known that company politics and attitudes are not followed. It does seem as though freedom of speech is becoming more restricted.

I hate to sound like an old hippie, but I do not know how else to say this. My generation called for free speech, demonstrations, protests and sit-ins. We did get our say by utilizing those tools and by working around and through the system. I admit that there were rough spots, but the vast majority took Gandhi and Martin Luther King to heart. Flower power was not for running our cars! Peace was more than a slogan that sounded cool and no one ever thought that sitting down somewhere and refusing to move could fail to bring out administration for “a chat”. It usually worked. 

What the kids are doing now is self-defeating. It brings no one to the table. Nobody is inclined to listen to a violent mob, if anything one would be much less so. Suddenly, speaking out against the rioting and the violence brings accusations of racism, white supremacy and prejudice, etc. This is the left using language and political correctness to manage society and public opinion. It is not First Amendment. It is not even honest or truthful. It closes the discussion and the two sides hate each other because of name calling. We were better than this ten to fifteen years ago! We are regressing!!

I am making these points because more people complain to me every day about the loss of their First Amendment rights. What they are really complaining about is the control over politically correct language that the left exercises mercilessly. Part of that control is our fault because we give in and abide by their rules, we stop speaking out because we are afraid. 

If we want to remain free and if we want to stop the long slow progression towards allowing the left to write and pass these politically correct but Constitutionally offensive ideas into law…then we had better support our President, vote conservative in 2018, check voting records and become more aware. The establishment Republicans are every bit as guilty and bad as the Democrats. We need Representatives who want to do the right thing, work with our President to lower taxes, straighten out health care, kick out the lobbyists, strengthen the military and audit the pentagon not make themselves rich!

Maligned and Defamed 

It is a story that isn’t too unusual in our military community, at least not in the beginning…..

This man came from a nice family but they did not have money. When it came time for college, he opted for and had a chance to go to the military academy and did very well graduating second in his class. He was popular with his classmates and well regarded by the faculty. To shorten the story as much as possible, as usually happens at some time during a military career of honor, good character and high principles, a moment of decision came after 36 years of exemplary service to our country. His values, his morals, his beliefs, his priorities were all challenged and he was tested. He was between a rock and a very hard place. He did the only thing that he could honorably do, he resigned his commission and left his beloved United States and the army to travel back to Virginia and defend his state, his home, his family and friends against military invasion. He knew that it was being planned, he knew it was coming because his resignation had been turned in because he had been offered command of the troops scheduled to attack Virginia. This man’s name, of course, was Robert E. Lee.

I know he was not fighting to prolong slavery and that he was not racist for his time since he had quietly freed his slaves ten years earlier. One former slave who stayed with him through the war was named in his will and was left a large sum of money (for that era) for education.  At a much later time this former slave (Rev. William Mack Lee) would author an autobiography in which he would describe Lee in glowing terms. He began preaching before the war and after the war he built at least four large churches and became a well known African American Preacher in Virginia. He had the autobiography printed in order to raise money for his current church. (I think he was in his eighties.) http://docsouth.unc.edu/neh/leewilliam/lee.html

Robert E. Lee letter dated December 27, 1856:

          I was much pleased the with President’s message. His views of the systematic and progressive efforts of certain people at the North to interfere with and change the domestic institutions of the South are truthfully and faithfully expressed. The consequences of their plans and purposes are also clearly set forth. These people must be aware that their object is both unlawful and foreign to them and to their duty, and that this institution, for which they are irresponsible and non-accountable, can only be changed by them through the agency of a civil and servile war. There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil. It is idle to expatiate on its disadvantages. I think it is a greater evil to the white than to the colored race. 

    So far from engaging in a war to perpetuate slavery, I am rejoiced that Slavery is abolished. I believe it will be greatly for the interest of the South. So fully am I satisfied of this that I would have cheerfully lost all that I have lost by the war, and have suffered all that I have suffered to have this object attained.
    General Robert E. Lee, May 1, 1870

    So, we now have people trying to tear down this gentle man’s statue. Most who could not hold a candle to how he lived his life every day yet they think themselves qualified to judge him? How much do they really know about him, other than what the talking points say? Why has it become so easy for fringe elements to tear down monuments?

    This is becoming frightening!

    http://www.historynet.com/robert-e-lee

    http://www.vahistorical.org/collections-and-resources/virginia-history-explorer/lee-and-grant

    http://civilwarhome.com/leebio.html

    http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_lee_robert.html

    Preacher01704's Weblog

    My Published Works

    A Backpack , A Chair and A Beard

    Think of all the beauty still left around you, and be happy

    Classic, Not Contemporary

    Reviving classical life in a modern world

    larrysmusings

    This WordPress.com site is for insights, observations and commentary on various issues. We are part social critic, part philosopher, part dreamer, and part seeker after elusive truths.

    A swede's take on America

    politics, islam, usa, sweden, muslims, middle east, world politics

    The Rouser

    Wake up. Ask Why?

    Reclaim Our Republic

    Knowledge Is Power

    SMALLGOVREPORT

    Always question the premise

    %d bloggers like this: